Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords
Pharmacoepidemiology and Risk Management 2024; 16(1): 65-78
Published online March 31, 2024 https://doi.org/10.56142/perm.24.0006
Copyright © Korean Society for Pharmacoepidemiology and Risk Management.
Yunju Choe1, Se Jung Park1, Ju Hwan Kim2, Dongwon Yoon1,2, Dong Yoon Kang3, Jae Hoon Jung4, Ju-Young Shin1,2,5
최윤주1, 박세정1, 김주환2, 윤동원1,2, 강동윤3, 정재훈4, 신주영1,2,5
Correspondence to:Ju-Young Shin
School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Korea
Tel: +82-31-290-7702
Fax: +82-31-292-8800
E-mail: shin.jy@skku.edu
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir and adverse events and identify safety signals not previously known. Methods: To identify major adverse events and safety signals associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir, we conducted pharmacovigilance study using drug-related adverse events reported to KIDS KAERS DB (2305A0011). Disproportionality analysis were performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) method to detected new safety signals not listed in drug label. Results: Adverse events related to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir were frequently reported in women and person aged ≥ 65, and mostly reported as not serious. Following nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration, ‘sensory abnormalities’ (20.18%), ‘diarrhoea’ (13.76%), and ‘nausea and vomiting symptoms’ (9.87%) were most commonly reported, while for molnupiravir, ‘nausea and vomiting symptoms’ (15.92%), ‘neurological signs and symptoms’ (15.92%), ‘urticarias’ (10.45%) were predominantly reported. Disproportionality analysis revealed a significant association of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with ‘sensory abnormalities’ (ROR [95% CI] = 223.74 [207.24–241.55]), ‘interactions’ (ROR [95% CI] = 37.35 [15.10–92.35]), ‘faecal abnormalities’ (ROR [95% CI] = 32.33 [18.68–56.36]). Adverse events not listed on drug label included ‘olfactory nerve disorders’, ‘appitite disorder’, ‘hallucinations’ and urinary adverse events. For molnupiravir, strong association were observed with cardiovascular adverse events such as ‘heart rate and pulse investigations’ (ROR [95% CI] = 58.60 [18.96–181.16]) and ‘vascular tests’ (ROR [95% CI] = 10.97 [4.09–29.47]), which were not included in drug label. Conclusion: Adverse events following the use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir were generally not serious, but some safety signals not listed on drug label were newly detected and warranted attention. We expected this study to provide basic data of safety for oral antivirals of COVID-19 and may contribute to the development of future drug safety guidelines.
KeywordsNirmatrelvir and ritonavir drug combination, Molnupiravir, Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions, Pharmacovigilance